Archivi categoria: Monografica II

Spinoza. Problématisations contemporaines 

DOI:10.5281/zenodo.15692076

Download

Cécile Hellian

CESSP – EHESS (cecile.hellian@gmail.com; ORCID : 0009-0004-2021-6375).

 

Continua a leggere

Pubblicato in Monografica II, NUMERO 18 | Lascia un commento

“Ne pas rire, ne pas juger, ne pas haïr mais comprendre”: Spinoza et la question des différences aujourd’hui 

DOI:10.5281/zenodo.15692047

Download

Donna Grace Avome Ndoutoume

Ens Lyon, IHRIM (nolendonna2018@gmail.com; ORCID: 0009-0001-7859-1491).

 

“Don’t laugh, don’t judge, don’t hate but understand”: Spinoza and the question of differences today. 

Abstract: To study identity today is also to reflect on the question of differences, and in particular on how others view the multiple forms of dissimilarity that are continually being constructed in existence. Indeed, the singularization of conatus is not based solely on bodily determinations (visible bodily differences) or the nature of desires, affects, experiences, existing comforts and inconveniences and so on. It’s also shaped by all the other realities that contribute to … Continua a leggere

Pubblicato in Monografica II, NUMERO 18 | Lascia un commento

L’incorporation du discours chez Bourdieu. Vers une interprétation spinoziste

DOI:10.5281/zenodo.15691955

Download

Cécile Hellian

CESSP – EHESS (cecile.hellian@gmail.com; ORCID : 0009-0004-2021-6375).

 

The Incorporation of Discourse in Bourdieu’s Work: Towards a Spinozist Interpretation

Abstract: It’s rare that bodies succeed to change after a decision formulated in language. Others’ prescriptions about our actions often fail to product an effect up to our expectations. Regularly, Pierre Bourdieu notes this failure of the body’s modification through words. He also criticizes for example Sartre, some Marxists or feminists who fail to change their practices deeply, for not taking into account the impotence of discourses. Being awareness of a problem doesn’t allow to change radically practices. … Continua a leggere

Pubblicato in Monografica II, NUMERO 18 | Lascia un commento

Spinoza et Deligny. Réseaux, écritures, itinéraires 

DOI:10.5281/zenodo.15691987

Download

Pierre-François Moreau

École normale supérieure de Lyon (moreau.pf@free.fr; ORCID : 0009-0008-9056- 4884).

 

Spinoza et Deligny. Réseaux, écritures, itinéraires

Abstract: Deligny’s “tentatives” could be read within a Spinozist framework. Conversely, Deligny’s experience can lead to questions being raised about Spinoza’s practice and system. This can be seen in three conceptual and existential pairs: network/institution; publication/writing; nature/itinerary.

Keywords: Singular; Individual; Détermination; Work; Opportunity.… Continua a leggere

Pubblicato in Monografica II, NUMERO 18 | Lascia un commento

Philosopher comme un triangle. Ou comment géométriser quelques problèmes spinozistes 

DOI:10.5281/zenodo.15691918

Download

Sévérac Pascal

IREPH – IHRIM (pseverac@yahoo.fr; ORCID: 0000-0001-8808-4111).

 

Philosophy as a triangle. Or how to geometrise some Spinozist issues.

Abstract: We set out to revisit some of the problems of Spinozism with the help of a ruler and a compass, and with the aid of a triangle (and a bit of a circle too). In this way, we try to analyse the relationships between essence and property, between general singularity and particular singularity, and between mode and attribute.

Keywords: Essence; Property; Singular; Distinction; Attribute.… Continua a leggere

Pubblicato in Monografica II, NUMERO 18 | Lascia un commento